Some deserving messengers…
Belying the parting shot (literally!) at the end of my last post, here are a few interesting articles regarding the DSK case or rather, now it’s been dismissed, the ‘affair’.
- Clyde Haberman, who writes a blog hosted on the New York Times website, gives a stern but fair account of the unravelling of the case, both regarding the legal proceedings but also the wider context of what has happened, or seems to have happened…
- This article in the Independent is a more emotional account of why rape victims must have flawless past to get justice. It’s not just because of procedure governing the criminal trial though, and has much to do with the way rapists ‘pick’ their victim in the first place (hint: it’s not the ‘pretty’ or ‘sexy’ ones…). This is an important and rarely considered point, though the way Joan Smith applies it to the DSK/Diallo case is not exactly fair to the prosecutor. She asks:
Are prosecutors really saying that anyone who has lied on an asylum application cannot be considered a credible witness in an unrelated matter, no matter how many years later and regardless of forensic evidence supporting their claims?
be setting the bar too high, as well as sending a message that some potential victims cannot expect the protection of the law.
- From across the pond, William Saleton in Slate gives an interesting and potentially controversial reading of the motion to dismiss the case, which according to him overstated both the case against DSK and that against Ms Diallo. He rejects most of the prosecutor’s conclusions and mainly on practical facts, for example questioning the quality of the translation of Ms Diallo’s phone calls in Fulani. However, the fact that he still believes that the case should indeed have been dropped makes his reading of the document more nuanced and more persuasive than its other, less convincing and worse-informed, detractors…
- And, finally, from across the smaller pond, an article (in French) by an American lawyer reminding all those envious of such an expeditious and seemingly fair criminal justice system. Not only was a powerful and influential man arrested within a few hours of his being accused of rape by a chambermaid, but in four months, and after only a few days in prison, the case was resolved. However, as Mr Greenfield reminds us, it is
but another example of a horribly imperfect system, upon which many lives depend, which has just had the good fortune of working well this time…